Recently, a library patron challenged (urged a reconsideration of the ownership or placement of) a book called Uncle Bobby's Wedding. Honestly, I hadn't even heard of it until that complaint. But I did read the book, and responded to the patron, who challenged the item through email and requested that I respond online (not via snail-mail) about her concerns. I suspect the book will get a lot of challenges in 2008-2009. So I offer my response, purging the patron's name, for other librarians.
Dear Ms. Patron:
Thank you for working with my assistant to allow me to fit your concerns about Uncle Bobby's Wedding, by Sarah S. Brannen, into our “reconsideration” process. I have been assured that you have received and viewed our relevant policies: the Library Bill of Rights, the Freedom to Read, Free Access to Libraries for Minors, the Freedom to View, and our Reconsideration Policy.
The intent of providing all that isn't just to occupy your time. It's to demonstrate that our lay Board of Trusteeswhich has reviewed and adopted these policies on behalf of our libraryhas spent time thinking about the context in which the library operates, and thoughtfully considered the occasional discomfort (with our culture or constituents) that might result. There's a lot to consider.
Read more of library director Jamie LaRue's response from his online blog. LaRue is director of the public libraries in Castle Rock, Douglas County, Colorado.
Posted by Louise Ash on 12 August 2008 in Gender Issues