NCLB an unfunded mandate or a compact?

 The National Education Association (NEA) suggested this week that school districts need not use their own money to pay for obligations under the No Child Left Behind Act, in the wake of a federal appeals court ruling that revived the union’s lawsuit challenging the law as an unfunded federal mandate. The Jan. 7 ruling means that “as a condition of participation in the No Child Left Behind Act, a school district or state cannot be compelled to use its own resources to carry out that mandate,” Robert H. Chanin, the general counsel of the NEA and the architect of the lawsuit, argued in an interview.

But other supporters of the lawsuit were more cautious, and the defendant in the case—U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings—suggested that the decision was far from the last word on the subject. “No Child Left Behind is strong and on the books, and will be abided by by the states and the federal government,” Spellings said after a speech at the National Press Club in Washington. Read more about the brewing controversy in Education Week online.