previous entryStudy: Benefits of full-day kindergarten can be elusive  |  “Year of Education” or “evisceration” in California?next entry

Phonics, synthetic and analytic, subject of controversy

The latest results from a seven-year Scottish study show that children taught how to put sounds together to read words, called synthetic phonics, had significantly better reading skills than their peers taught using analytic phonics, breaking whole words into their constituent sounds.

But Australian literacy researcher Allan Luke, from the Queensland University of Technology, questions the validity of using evidence-based research in assessing teaching methods. Luke, a former director-general of the Queensland Education Department and ministerial adviser on education, has dismissed scientific studies showing the benefit of phonics. Speaking at a curriculum symposium last month, he said the studies provided no evidence that alternate methods had failed. Read about the literacy controversy in The Australian online.

Posted by Louise Ash on 11 January 2008 in Methodology

The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

menu arrowTeaching Tools

menu arrowIssues in Literacy:

News from Reading Today Daily

Focus on Topics in Reading

Press Room

Position Statements

Resolutions

Reports

menu arrowLiteracy Community

menu arrowCareer Center

menu arrowEvents and Updates

menu arrowReading Today
(Print Edition)


menu arrowNew! IRA Announcements

Links

Blog: Legislative Action Team Advisory

Categories and Archives

See all Categories and Weekly Archives

About This Blog

What is this?

Get Involved and Contact the Contributors

Disclaimer

Syndication

RSS 2.0

RSS 1.0

Atom