previous entryMinneapolis: Most literate city in the United States  |  States expanding public pre-K programsnext entry

Reading First budget cut a “a loss for literacy?”

Reading First, funded at $1 billion per year, is among the most promising federal efforts to help the poor. Title I, funded at $12 billion per year, is not nearly so effective. That President Bush has just signed into law a 2008 budget that gives the latter an 8.6% increase in funding and the former a 64% decrease confirms the wisdom of Lincoln, who observed, “In republican democracies, public sentiment is everything. With it nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.”

Notwithstanding Reading First’s success increasing early literacy rates among the poor, public sentiment for the program remains weaker than that of its enemies, who have proved more influential in Congress and more determined than Reading First’s stewards in the administration. Continue reading this opinion piece by Shepard Barbash in The National Review online.

Posted by Louise Ash on 04 January 2008 in Opinion

The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

menu arrowTeaching Tools

menu arrowIssues in Literacy:

News from Reading Today Daily

Focus on Topics in Reading

Press Room

Position Statements

Resolutions

Reports

menu arrowLiteracy Community

menu arrowCareer Center

menu arrowEvents and Updates

menu arrowReading Today
(Print Edition)


menu arrowNew! IRA Announcements

Links

Blog: Legislative Action Team Advisory

Categories and Archives

See all Categories and Weekly Archives

About This Blog

What is this?

Get Involved and Contact the Contributors

Disclaimer

Syndication

RSS 2.0

RSS 1.0

Atom