previous entryControversial reading course for Alaskan teachers on hold  |  Libraries turn page to new servicesnext entry

Opinion: Columnist George Will bashes NCLB

NCLB Icon No Child Left Behind, supposedly an antidote to the “soft bigotry of low expectations,” has instead spawned lowered standards. The law will eventually be reauthorized because doubling down on losing bets is what Washington does. But because NCLB contains incentives for perverse behavior, reauthorization should include legislation empowering states to ignore it. NCLB was passed in 2001 as an extension of the original mistake, President Lyndon Johnson’s Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the first large Washington intrusion into education K through 12.

This expansion of Washington’s role in the quintessential state and local responsibility was problematic, for three reasons. First, most new ideas are dubious, so federalization of policy increases the probability of continentwide mistakes. Second, education is susceptible to pedagogic fads and social engineering fantasies—schools of education incubate them—so it is prone to producing continental regrets. Third, America always is more likely to have a few wise state governments than a wise federal government. Read more of George Will’s opinion piece in The Cincinnati Post.

Posted by Louise Ash on 10 December 2007 in Opinion

The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

menu arrowTeaching Tools

menu arrowIssues in Literacy:

News from Reading Today Daily

Focus on Topics in Reading

Press Room

Position Statements

Resolutions

Reports

menu arrowLiteracy Community

menu arrowCareer Center

menu arrowEvents and Updates

menu arrowReading Today
(Print Edition)


menu arrowNew! IRA Announcements

Links

Blog: Legislative Action Team Advisory

Categories and Archives

See all Categories and Weekly Archives

About This Blog

What is this?

Get Involved and Contact the Contributors

Disclaimer

Syndication

RSS 2.0

RSS 1.0

Atom