A long-awaited review of beginning-reading programs by the federal What Works Clearinghouse found few comprehensive or supplemental programs that have evidence of effectiveness in raising student achievement. But what is missing from the review may be even more telling: None of the most popular commercial reading programs on the market had sufficiently rigorous studies to be included in the review by the Clearinghouse. Get details in Katherine Kennedy Manzos article in Education Week.
Posted by David Roberts on 21 August 2007 in Policy