previous entryAfter formal schooling ends, learning declines in Canada  |  Balloting opens for 2008 Charlotte Awardnext entry

How Nebraska leaves no child behind

NCLB Icon Most state education officials grumble that the pressure-packed annual tests and rigid adequate yearly progress targets engendered by the federal No Child Left Behind law are flawed means of measuring student proficiency, raising academic standards, holding schools accountable and fostering learning. But since the penalty for defying the law is loss of federal funds, most treat NCLB’s prescriptives like bitter medicine they can’t afford to spit out. All, that is, except the iconoclasts who run the public schools in Nebraska. Read more about the Nebraska model in this article from Time magazine. And then, read how Time would fix the law in this article.

Posted by Steve Groft on 30 May 2007 in Issues in the News , Policy

The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

menu arrowTeaching Tools

menu arrowIssues in Literacy:

News from Reading Today Daily

Focus on Topics in Reading

Press Room

Position Statements

Resolutions

Reports

menu arrowLiteracy Community

menu arrowCareer Center

menu arrowEvents and Updates

menu arrowReading Today
(Print Edition)


menu arrowNew! IRA Announcements

Links

Blog: Legislative Action Team Advisory

Categories and Archives

See all Categories and Weekly Archives

About This Blog

What is this?

Get Involved and Contact the Contributors

Disclaimer

Syndication

RSS 2.0

RSS 1.0

Atom