Most state education officials grumble that the pressure-packed annual tests and rigid adequate yearly progress targets engendered by the federal No Child Left Behind law are flawed means of measuring student proficiency, raising academic standards, holding schools accountable and fostering learning. But since the penalty for defying the law is loss of federal funds, most treat NCLBs prescriptives like bitter medicine they cant afford to spit out. All, that is, except the iconoclasts who run the public schools in Nebraska. Read more about the Nebraska model in this article from Time magazine. And then, read how Time would fix the law in this article.
Posted by Steve Groft on 30 May 2007 in Issues in the News , Policy