previous entryA higher bar for future teachers  |  Bilingual pupils do better in exams, report findsnext entry

Report: ED Ignored early warnings on Reading First conflicts

“Almost from the inception of Reading First, critics raised red flags about the potential of the initiative to blur the lines between commerce and policy.”

In an essay posted at the Title I Online website, authors Andrew Brownstein and Travis Hicks provide a summary of events leading to last September’s report by the Office of the Inspector General that prompted charges of corruption and conflict of interest against the Department of Education and the professionals it appointed to implement the program.

Posted by David Roberts on 31 October 2006 in Curriculum , Hot Topics

The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

menu arrowTeaching Tools

menu arrowIssues in Literacy:

News from Reading Today Daily

Focus on Topics in Reading

Press Room

Position Statements

Resolutions

Reports

menu arrowLiteracy Community

menu arrowCareer Center

menu arrowEvents and Updates

menu arrowReading Today
(Print Edition)


menu arrowNew! IRA Announcements

Links

Blog: Legislative Action Team Advisory

Categories and Archives

See all Categories and Weekly Archives

About This Blog

What is this?

Get Involved and Contact the Contributors

Disclaimer

Syndication

RSS 2.0

RSS 1.0

Atom